When I was
in grade 10, my English class read Lord of the Flies. I can’t say I remember
all that much about the book, but I do have a very distinct memory of the
projects we presented in front of the class.
We were
split into groups and each group had to do a presentation on the same set of
questions. I don’t know if all the other groups handled the project the same
way, but my group split the questions up, making each member of the group
responsible for presenting the answer to their questions.
The
questions I took asked me to define what, in the book, was the Lord of the
Flies and the Monster that was frequently mentioned. I chose the questions
because the answer was so clear and obvious to me.
When it
came time for the presentations, my group went last. So, before making my
presentation, I first heard the question answered by several other people. I
was astounded – every answer presented was almost exactly the same. They boiled
down to, “The Lord of the Flies is the pig head the boys put on a stake, and
the Monster is the dead parachuter stuck on the cliff.” I couldn’t believe what
I was hearing. Everyone had the same answer but me.
When I stood
up to present my answer, I started by saying, “Well, my answer is a bit
different than what others have said.” I then proceeded to explain how the
Monster, while personified by the dead parachuter, was a representation of all
the fears of the group of boys stranded on the island. Meanwhile, the Lord of
the Flies was all the anger, hatred and violence that was awakened in the boys
by their need to survive and their desires to do whatever they wanted. This
was, of course, given visual representation by the bloody pig head on a spike,
swarming with flies.
I remember
the class staring at me, dumbfounded. I don’t recall if the teacher’s expression
was shocked or impressed – and I have no memory of the mark I received on the
project.
But I did
find a deep understanding from that experience. You see, to me, the answer my
classmates gave was too simple – they were facts pretty much stated in the
book. What was the point in even asking those questions if there wasn’t
something more? But others stopped at that answer, because, yes, it was
obvious.
However, to
me, my answer was just as obvious. It was simply more abstract, but it had to
be what the question was asking about. On the other hand, the stares I received
told me that what was obvious to me hadn’t been obvious to others.
From that,
I learned that different things are obvious to different people – and that,
generally speaking, when people find something they believe obvious, they stop.
It’s obvious – why would they think about it further?
I learned
that, just because something is obvious, that doesn’t mean it’s obvious to
everyone.
Something being obvious doesn’t necessarily
mean it’s true.
Also, make sure you check out my wife's blog and her life coaching website.
If there's any subject you'd like to see me ramble on about, feel free to leave a comment asking me to do so.
No comments:
Post a Comment